Kleiner Hinweis: Die Bundesnetzagentur (BNetzA) hat Hinweise darauf erhalten, dass vermehrt gefälschte Briefe im Umlauf sind. Darin werden die Adressaten beschuldigt, eine Photovoltaikanlage nicht ordnungsgemäß im Marktstammdatenregister registriert zu haben. Die Registrierung soll dann per Mail an eine gefälschte Mailadresse erfolgen.
Die Schreiben würden auf den ersten Blick relativ echt aussehen, anhand einiger „Fehler“ kann man sie aber wohl relativ gut erkennen:
Die Bundesnetzagentur rät dazu, keine persönlichen Daten herauszugeben und keine Überweisungen an die in den Schreiben angegebenen Bankverbindungen zu tätigen. Die Bundesnetzagentur würde keine solche Schreiben verschicken.
Quelle: BNetzA
Bundesnetzagentur warnt vor Kontaktaufnahme durch Betrüger
Wer so blöd ist und nicht prüft?
Also ich hatte früher mal so ein brief bekommen vom Staat 2012 oder so da war den drin das ich mein adressen und Email und so angeben müsste innerhalb 2 wochen sonst gibt’s ne Strafe, die damalige Partnerin hatte schon angst und ich ööm Nene ist Fälschung.😂
Na hoffentlich wurde das Konto bei Mail.de gesperrt. Sie werben ja mit „mehr Sicherheit, Seriosität …“
Bei dem „vermeintlichen Konto der Bundesnetzagentur“, sofern es denn keiner exotischen Bank zugehörig ist, muss ja bei Überweisungsversuch die SEPA-Namensüberprüfung anspringen, wo dann auch der letzte Depp kappieren sollte, dass da was nicht stimmt.
Für die ganzen Leute da draußen, die Ihre Balkonanlage nicht im Marktstammdatenregister angemeldet haben, und das sind unzählige… die dürfen gerne auf diesen Mist reinfallen.
Prinzipiell hast Du recht, allerdings machen nicht alle Banken mit … Selbst welche aus der EU … Dann wird das mit einem Hinweis übersprungen …
gepostet mit der Deskmodder.de-App
Sometimes I’m famous for being a lengthy narrator in just a short form article, but I have seen websites like these before and I always get confused between whether this is focused on just a single continent or the entire globe. For instance, I don’t know if this is related to Europe and their countries, or if this effects the North American continents just like most of us are around as well.
You know, with the help of translation and AI, as much as we hate them, and maybe a few worldwide visits, anybody could be in danger of something like this; It’s possible that the fraudsters in charge of hosting these kinds of scams, they are hoping that many people will fall victim to it. Kind of like somehow in our political environment over here in the United States, that’s kind of the model right now, and very few people will want to get away with it, or at least try to.
There’s a lot of warnings I’d like to, you know, think about and possibly spout out along the way, but I’m sure people are very uninterested in protecting themselves, at least it appears so far. Modern society has always been a road towards making people more cynical in the first place, and voice dictation, like I’m using to express my opinions and my writings anymore because of new accessibility standards, make it far easier for me to say at least personally what I’m thinking without having to focus on what it actually sounds like.
One big warning I can give as a individual without knowing the specific criteria and intent to prevent people from doing so or allowing these parties to get what they want, is never give out your information and never trust strangers, especially with your business. I have never heard of an organization such as the Federal Network Agency advising against anybody and it’s certainly news to me over here in America. If there is such of an cautionary organization. However, I would say as an individual, It makes it more confusing to, uh, warn against if you don’t know if you’re looking at things from a business perspective or a corporate perspective or just a community and volunteer perspective of different members. And maybe that could be one thing that these fraudsters and these supposedly Worldwide federal agencies are looking for, but I have to say, you know whether you decide to provide your opinions and your information is totally at your discretion.
In fact, it is possible that it’s a better thing to use discretion and visit your opinions as an individual instead of as a group or or corporate perspective, I find overall credibility is more looked up upon highly from member to member or school to school, something that is based upon people and their impact rather than a bunch of groups or independent organizations or new technologies learning to provide a service to somebody else for a profit.
There are always different examples that aim to, you know, progress and set the tone of what is supposed to be perfected in the future or what you hope to do at the end of the day. Altogether though, what really matters most, but besides what you hope to do and what you choose to do and who you trust to do it with is what are you trying to do and is it more important than paying the bills at night?
That’s my opinion at least, and maybe I am generalizing more than I should because I don’t understand different languages in a bilingual form or a multinational corporation overall. But I believe as an individual and a creator myself with my profession, that it’s more important to impact other people and have them decide whether or not things you create are useful. Then try to, you know, build a corporation for an additional amount of money in your bank account, and then you become a target for somebody to scam or phish In the first place, But besides remembering why people are trying to target you, whether it’s to harm or profit off of you as a person or a service, know that it’s important to keep your morals and ethics respectable so that more people will decide to come back to you and what you have to offer.
That is one thing that scammers and fraudsters do not usually have at the end of the day, And I apologize if this is more of a opinionated narrative than an actual educational piece of information, but we are living in a world where respect and intelligence are highly undervalued anymore, and I believe the real tragedy is allowing them to take that away from you before you even know it’s gone.
Auch das Nichtexistente ist zu gendern: „Das Schreiben hat keinen Unterzeichner bzw. keine Unterzeichnerin.“ 😉